Edvog

One morning, a small site owner opens their analytics dashboard and sees a cliff. Traffic is down 60 percent overnight. Nothing obvious has changed. The site still loads. The content is still there. No warnings appear in the console. Emails to support go unanswered, because there is no direct support. For many creators, publishers, and small businesses, this moment is not hypothetical. It is a recurring experience tied to how Google operates its search systems at scale. The damage is rarely framed as damage. It arrives silently, without explanation, attribution, or recourse. Users are left to interpret outcomes on their own, often assuming they did something wrong. What makes this situation difficult is not just the loss itself, but the absence of accountability signals in a system that quietly shapes visibility, income, and survival for millions of sites. What becomes clear after this happens a few times After the initial shock wears off, most site owners do the same things. They chec...

Spotify is one of the largest music platforms in the world. For independent artists, it represents access to a global audience, frictionless distribution, and the promise of monetization through streams. At the same time, Spotify operates an extensive fraud detection system designed to protect advertisers, rights holders, and the platform itself. In practice, many legitimate artists report being harmed by this system, even when they have not intentionally violated any rules. This article explains how Spotify's fraud detection works at a systems level, why it disproportionately affects small artists, and why these outcomes do not require bad actors or malicious intent to occur. Why fraud detection exists at all Streaming fraud is a real problem. It includes practices like artificial streaming, bot networks, playlist manipulation, and other behaviors that inflate play counts without real listeners. Because Spotify operates at massive scale, it relies heavily on automated systems to d...

For many people who publish online, Google AdSense looks like the simplest path to monetization. You add a few lines of code, Google places ads, and you earn money when visitors see or click them. On paper, it feels open to anyone. In practice, AdSense tends to work safely and predictably only for large, established websites. Smaller publishers can use it, but they absorb far more risk. This difference does not require bad intentions. It emerges from automation, scale, and how enforcement systems operate when millions of sites are involved. This article explains how that imbalance forms, why it keeps showing up in creator reports, and what it means if you run a small or growing website. What "AdSense safety" actually means When publishers talk about AdSense being "safe", they usually mean three things. First, earnings are stable. Revenue does not suddenly disappear because ads were limited, disabled, or accounts were terminated. Second, enforcement actions are predi...

Master AI from basics to advanced techniques, covering Python, machine learning, deep learning, NLP, reinforcement learning, and real-world applications.

Learn the basics of robotics, electronics, programming, sensors, actuators, control systems, and AI in this comprehensive robotics course.